What are the primary differences theologically between Judaism,
Conservative Messianic
Judaism, and Christianity regarding the Torah?
This week we will begin to delve deeper into each on the categories we
discussed at a high level last week. Before we begin, a brief disclaimer. We
do not believe everyone has to believe exactly as we do to have a
relationship with G-D, and for that relationship to result in that person
spending eternity with G-D. We also believe strongly in the promise that
Rabbi Sha'ul (Paul) stated that "all Israel will be saved." We do not want
to be dogmatic about exactly what that means, as views differ. We also
believe scripture clearly teaches that Jews, Christians and Messianic Jews
will make up the Kingdom. As for our Sunday brothers and sisters, whether
Protestant or Catholic, many truly love G-D and will inherit the Kingdom.
Theologically, Judaism, Conservative Messianic Judaism, and Christianity began on a
common road that split into 3 separate paths. One of the key areas involved
in this split was the role of Torah.
Traditional Judaism
In traditional Jewish beliefs The Torah is core to Jewish life and thought.
While that is still true, in many parts of Judaism, the Written Torah has
become less important that the Oral Torah and teachings of the Sages and
Rabbis. Thus some modern practices do not follow the Torah, but instead the
teachings of the Rabbi's. An example, Biblically Jewishness is determined by
the Father (Paternal descent), however the Rabbi's determined that ones
Jewishness is determined by the mother (Maternal descent).
There is a famous story recorded in the Talmud concerning the authority of
the Rabbi's. Rabbi Eliazar (a very famous Rabbi from right after the time of
Messiah) was debating a certain point of Halacha (Jewish legal rulings) with
a group of Rabbis. No matter how he tried, he was not able to get them to
agree to his view. At this point he stated, 'if that carob Tree moves will
you agree with my ruling?'. The tree then moved over many feet. The other
Rabbis were not impressed, saying 'what does a Carob tree have to do with
this ruling'. Rabbi Eliazar then said, 'if this stream flows backward will
you agree?'. At that point the stream began to flow backward. The other
Rabbis again stated, 'what does water have to do with this decision?'. That
this point Rabbi Eliazar proclaimed, 'if a voice from Heaven (Bat Kol) tells
you I am right, will you then agree?'. A booming voice from Heaven then
proclaimed, 'Rabbi Eliazar is correct'. To this the other Rabbis exclaimed,
'even a voice from Heaven does not matter as the Holy One, Blessed be He,
gave the right to make these decisions to the Rabbis'.
From the above story paraphrased from the Talmud, one can see that Rabbinic
teaching has evolved to the point where the Rabbi's can interpret the Torah,
based on what they believe is their authority, in ways that are binding and
that do not agree with the p'shat (simple reading or meaning) expounding in
Torah.
It was these type rulings, not the written Torah, that Yeshua disagreed
with, often stating the oral traditions were contradicting the written
Torah.
Traditional Christianity
In traditional Christian beliefs concerning the role of Torah are best
summed up by 2 positions: 1. The Torah has little relevance for today as
"Jesus freed us from the Law" and it is painted as a huge burden, 2. Some
denominations (Baptist being one) separate the Torah into distinct sections
such as: Ceremonial Law, Moral Law and Civil Law and then state we are to
follow the Moral law, but not the Civil or Ceremonial.
Let's look at these 2 approaches in a little more depth:
1. Free from the "burden of the Torah" - This view is expounded by most
modern Christians, either consciously on sub-consciously. The view is based
on Rabbi Sha'uls (Paul) statements about the "Law being nailed to the cross"
amongst others. These arguments have serious flaws; some of which are:
* Sha'ul says the Torah is good and Holy, and that all scripture is good for
doctrine. The B'rit Chadsha (New or Renewed Testament) was not completed
when Paul and others commented about the importance of following the
Scriptures.
* Yeshua said not one yod or tittle of the Torah would pass away.
* Yochanan (John) says "sin is a violation of Torah" and that anyone who
keeps violating Torah (sinning) does not know G-d.
It is sad, but true, that many who call Messianic Judaism "Legalistic" are
themselves the ones who are Legalistic and as such are judging and bringing
about judgment and condemnation on themselves. In a recent debate with Rabbi Micha'el, Pat Donahue from the Church of Christ had the audacity to say the
we (Messianic Judaism) were not saved because we kept the Torah. That statement
shows that He, and those in the Church of Christ who agree, are themselves
judging others and thus bringing the judgement of G-d upon themselves. Pat
believes that the Torah is completely done away with and that the "Law of
Christ" only is what we are to follow. That supposition is totally
inaccurate, even by Paul's words and totally violates both the words of The
Messiah and His Emissary Yochanan (John 1 Chapter 3).
This can be further proven by the fact that Paul himself kept Torah after He
became a believer (Acts 21 where Paul takes a Nazarite vow). Paul even calls
himself a Pharisee.
Pat Donahue even made a statement that proved the point. Rabbi Micha'el
asked if Beastiality was prohibited as it is not mentioned in the New
Testament. Pat Donahue responded it was fornication. Then proceeded to quote
that fornication was any immoral sexual practice defined in the Law. The
only problem is the Law he was using to define Beastiality was the Torah,
making our point that the Torah is still to be followed.
2. Following the Moral Law only. While this approach has much more validity
than the above, it too has flaws. Many Commandments fit into more than one
group. The commandment for Shabbat is as much a moral law as it is a
ceremonial and civil law. Scripture also does not separate the Torah into
sections. Many Ceremonial laws will be practiced in The Messiah's Kingdom,
including sacrifice, the Feasts and the Levitical Priesthood. Additionally,
many Civil Laws, while they cannot be followed literally today, still
provide guidance. An example is the command to stone a witch. We today do
not have the authority to stone witches under our current legal system (this
included fortune tellers, etc.). We can however see that the behavior is
prohibited by Adonai, and as such, we should not have any part in it,
associate closely with those involved in witchcraft, or condone their
behavior.
Conservative Messianic Judaism
Conservative Messianic Judaism theology believes The Torah is the core of Jewish life and
thought. As such it is central to living a life of obedience to G-D. While
keeping Torah does not save us, it clearly shows us how to live a life
pleasing to G-D.
The aspect of obedience to Torah is clearly defined by Adonai as having
promises of Blessing attached. Thus by living out the Torah, Adonai has
promised to protect us and keep us from harm and provide for us. This
protective aspect is very important. Many of society's ills would be cured
immediately by keeping of Torah.
Imagine: no abortion, no murder, no poverty, no sexually transmitted
diseases, no unwed mothers, no prostitution, no stealing, no illegal drugs,
etc.
To the charges of Legalism, we are not saved by keeping Torah, and neither
was Abraham, Moses, Joshua, David, The prophets, or any other follower of
Adonai. We do not tell our Sunday Brothers they must keep Shabbat to be
saved.
Pat Donahue made the statement in the debate mentioned above, if you keep
Shabbat you must also keep New Moons, Passover, Yom Kippur and Succoth. To
this our reply is; this is a problem? Please make us worship Adonai more on
His Appointed Times (Moedim)!
No, Conservative Messianic Judaism should never be Legalistic, why, because we are free,
free to live the Torah by the power of Adonai living in us.
Next week we will address in detail the other Theological differences.
Shalom - Rabbi Gavri'el
